Recently in Divorce & Prejudice Category

As a Rhode Island lawyer focusing my practice mostly on divorce coaching these days I look back upon a man who said something to me privately decades ago that perplexed me.  This man had been practicing in another state for some 40+ years.

This man was about as true, honorable and generous a gentleman as I have ever met.  He embodied everything that I saw in a good lawyer.  He truly cared about his clients.  He fought for each one of them.  Yet he did so within the bounds of the law, within the bounds of his professional ethical code, and with a high degree of morality such as I have never seen before.  The lawyer knew that I admired him and had great respect for him as both a person and as a lawyer.  

One extremely hot Tuesday afternoon this rather portly lawyer returned to his office after losing a  district court hearing.  He plopped himself down in the chair at the opposite end of the short conference room table I was sitting at in the office law library.  His secretary nervously brought him a lemonade and napkin then quickly skirted out of the room.  There was silence.  It seemed to go on forever.  Finally, I said, "I'm considering becoming a lawyer."

It lasted perhaps two seconds but it seemed like an eternity.  The lawyer lifted his  partially balding forehead, wiped his brow with the napkin then grabbed a nearby law book and flung it across his small law library.  The book smashed against a row of New Hampshire Statutes Annotated.  I heard the spine of the hardcover book tear slightly as it fell to the floor.

It was one of the first times I had ever seen this man so angry and upset.

I was quiet.  Perhaps my timing was off.  This time I kept my big mouth shut and waited until the lawyer spoke.  This is what he said.

Lawyer:  [Very Loudly though not Shouting] "I HATE LAWYERS! 

This time the pause was endless and it seemed very clear the lawyer wasn't going to say anything else.  So, I took a chance.  I was just too puzzled not to speak.

Chris:  "I don't understand.  You are a lawyer."
    
He was quiet for another period of time.  I took a chance and asked my question.

Chris:  "How can you hate lawyers when you are one?  I don't get it."

He waited quite awhile before speaking.   I was thankful that there wasn't another hardcover book within the lawyer's reach.

Lawyer:  [ A bit calmer . .  ]   I can't explain it.  You have to live it.  But I tell you Chris, if you're anything like me you'll know what I mean when you get there.

That was it.  The conversation never went further.  It was never brought up again to this date.

I've been working in the legal field now for more than 20 years after that conversation.  

As a Rhode Island lawyer I am bound by a Professional Code of Ethical Conduct and Rules of Conduct.  To some extent there are things that I can say and things, things I shouldn't say and things I am prohibited either from saying or doing.  Some of them might amaze the layperson.  I know they amaze me.  Morality and Personal Professional Ethics are another ball of wax that are completely different.

The lawyer's name (for lack of a better one just as a point of reference) was Roger.

Hopefully he's still alive and hopefully he is in tune enough with today's "internet" that he reads this article.

So after all the years that have passed I would like to address one statement to this great lawyer and then another one to you as my reader.

First, to this great lawyer.

Roger, I went down the path.  Just as you thought, I was very much like you.  Thank you for your wisdom.  Just as you thought, I understand. 

Now, to my readers I offer this.

If you have read my message to Roger then you may not understand the statement I make now until you meet with me.

"If you need a lawyer and you happen to like lawyers then chances are . . you won't like me."

With that said, I can tell you that as a Rhode Island Lawyer who has focused my practice exclusively in the area of divorce and family law, I can't make your problems go away.  They are your problems and only you can take responsibility for them and only you have the power to resolve them in your life by your own decisions.

What I can tell you is that I can help you understand and to get through your Rhode Island divorce and family law challenges by working with you as your Coach or by working for you through Representation.

Roger's words were invaluable.  Today, they are the powerful force motivating the continued growth of your coaching program.  It is a your program specifically because it is designed for you.  It is designed to teach you, train you, inform you, and save you time and money in the areas of divorce and family law.

As Your Coaching Program continues to evolve, it will continue to work faster for you, become more economical than it already is for you, become more helpful than it already is for everyone.

Whatever you choose to believe, there is one thing you can know with certainty.  I am one lawyer trying to make a difference with a new and innovative way of practice designed by my sacrifices and your willingness to be open to something new that works. 

What can Your Coaching Program Help You With?

Rhode Island Divorces & Legal Separations
Rhode Island Child Support Establishment, Modification, Collection and Termination
Rhode Island Child Custody and Child Custody Modifications
Rhode Island Petitions to Enforced Marital or Property Settlement Agreements
Preparing Pre-Nuptual Agreements and Ante-Nuptual Agreements
Petitions to Move Out of State with Minor Children
Rhode Island Motions to Modify Child Support
Petitions to Establish Paternity
Motions to Adjudge In Contempt and Defense of Contempt
Protection from Abuse Petitions and Defense Against Such Petitions
Rhode Island Motions and Petitions to Establish, Modify or Terminate Visitation
RI Common Law Divorces and their Defense
Rhode Island Legal Rights
2nd Opinions on Rhode Island Family Law Cases
and many more . . . 

Look for my testimonials section coming soon!  Call for a low-cost Coaching Session!

Authored By:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Attorney-at-Law

Rhode Island's Full-Time Divorce* Lawyer is Now
Rhode Island's Only Divorce and Family Law Coach
!!

Discover the Tremendous Benefits You Receive by 

Participating in Family Law Coaching Sessions!

Go to RhodeIslandDivorceCoach.com


Call (401) 632-6976 Now
to
Schedule Your Low-Cost Rhode Island Divorce* or Family Law* Coaching Session!

Copyright 2009 to Present.  Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
 Offering Divorce and Family Law Coaching for a New Millenium!

* Rhode Island licenses all attorneys in the general practice of law.

- - Recommended Websites - -

Pearsall.net | AttorneyPearsall.com | Rhode Island Divorce Tips | ChristopherPearsall.com | GuaranteedWealth.com | Rhode Island Divorce Attorney | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer | ChrisPearsall.com | LegalScholar.com | Pearsall-Law-Associates.comRhode Island Divorce Attorneys | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers | Rhode Island Divorce Coach  |  RI Divorce Coach | RI Divorce Lawyer on Twitter | Rhode Island Divorce Coach on Twitter | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer on Facebook.com | 

What some RI Divorce Lawyers do that Judges may buy into!

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

A Rhode Island divorce can be traumatic even if you have a lawyer to help you through it.  There is no doubt that some people are more fragile than others.  Some women who have been "jilted" or "scorned" may be angry, experience denial or otherwise need counseling.  Some men who have been good providers and faithful for years may find that they need some mental health services to get through a difficult divorce when they just don't understand what went wrong in their marriage.

Though it is often difficult for most people to deal with divorce, some people seem to get through it just fine even if they are not the party who filed the divorce action.  Experiences are not only varied but they are interesting to note.

Yet what is not so interesting, nor enjoyable is when Rhode Island family law lawyers represent a client and help them to achieve what may be self-centered goals by helping them create a situation where none existed before.

An example is perhaps the best way to illustrate this.

Peter and Claudia have been married for 18 years.  They have no minor children and own a home together.  Peter files for divorce which Claudia claims is "out of the blue" and a "complete shock to her" even though Peter has approached her numerous times over the last year about how unhappy he was with their relationship.  Apparently Claudia attributed it to a mid-life crisis or something Peter would pass through.  Peter files for divorce.  Claudia had been working for the past ten (10) years and she is upset and depressed about the divorce filing.  Claudia takes time out of work and begins thinking and re-thinking why Peter would do this to her.  Claudia considers that there must be another woman.  Claudia also considers that Peter should have done more in the marriage to make it work or that he should have suggested counseling.  Claudia gets angry and then more upset as thoughts of the last 18 years run through her mind. 

This is not an uncommon thought process for a woman to go through. 

Claudia returns to work but her mind isn't on her work as it should be and her work just isn't up to par.  Claudia's boss mentions it and Claudia is now fearful for her job security.  Claudia consults and hires a divorce attorney who suggests that she go to a psychologist or a mental health counselor about her feelings.  Claudia takes the attorney's advice and goes to an individual and marriage counseling specialist.  The counselor confirms that Claudia is understandably depressed by the divorce situation.  Claudia feels better after going to the counselor and continues to see the counselor on a weekly basis.

Claudia is advised to take an extended leave from work to deal with her divorce and the emotions she is going through.  Claudia continues to go to counseling.  After a month or so Claudia's attorney starts arguing to the court that Claudia should receive alimony from Peter for at least two years.

Peter's attorney asks for the reason why Claudia should be awarded alimony.  Claudia's attorney is adamant that Claudia is now in a deep depression, has lost time out of work and is unable to do her work effectively as a result of Peter's filing for divorce.  Claudia's attorney argues to the judge that if he can prove Claudia's depression and that it resulted from the divorce filing then Claudia needs a recovery period and needs to rehabilitate her mental state to be able to function in the working world again.

Situational depression is a common side effect of most divorces.  However, to argue that alimony should be awarded because one party has an adverse reaction to a divorce filing is essentially punishing the payer spouse merely for filing for divorce because the relationship has failed.

Yet it has been argued by some Rhode Island divorce lawyers that rehabilitative alimony is justified for a spouse who gets situational depression as a result of the divorce filing itself.  Regrettably, some Rhode Island family court judges have bought into the argument if it is adamantly argued with the right tenor and the right documentation. 

An important tip is to note when the onset of the depression symptoms occurred.  Even if the depression relates directly to the breakdown of the marriage, the lack of a diagnosis of chronic depression by a psychologist, depression is not and should not reasonably a basis for rehabilitative alimony, especially for those spouses who were previously capable of earning an income and only incur difficulty as a result of the divorce filing or the breakdown of the relationship. 

A person's inability to cope with the actual legal proceeding that precipitates the alleged depression is not a reasonable basis for alimony.  No rehabilitation is needed to acquire more education or new skills or for entry into the workforce.  These are the fundamentals for rehabilitative alimony in Rhode Island and as such alimony based upon anything other than a longstanding chronic depression should be opposed strenuously.  Most judges will see this for what it is if you give evidence of the timing of the depression but be wary.  A difficult battle may be on the horizon if Alimony is a primary goal of your spouse.

Authored By:

  Christopher A. Pearsall
Attorney-at-Law
70 Dogwood Drive, Suite 304
West Warwick, RI 02893

Call (401) 632-6976 Now for your low-cost consultation.
from
Rhode Island's Most Affordable Divorce & Family Law* Attorney
now
100% Digital and Virtual!

Copyright 2008.  Christopher A. Pearsall, A New Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer for a New Millenium

*The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all attorneys in the general practice of law.
Pearsall.net | AttorneyPearsall.com | Rhode Island Divorce Tips | ChristopherPearsall.com | GuaranteedWealth.com
| Rhode Island Divorce Attorney | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer | Chris Pearsall
| Legal Scholar | Pearsall Law Associates | Rhode Island Divorce Attorneys | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers |  

Rhode Island Divorce Tip: Inconsistencies Part I

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

As a Rhode Island lawyer choosing to focus my practice on divorce and family law I've had the opportunity to witness some inconsistencies in the divorce and family law process.  Perhaps you're surprised, perhaps not. Yet it you're not aware of these inconsistencies before you walk into the Rhode Island Family Court, then you may be in for a rude awakening.

So let's be sure you're informed about your divorce.

1)  Different Rhode Island judges give you different results.

All it takes is one example to grasp this little divorce twist.  Judge A in sits in Courtroom 5A.  Judge C sits in Courtroom 5C two doors down.  Both judges will be hearing a Motion to Modify Child Support today.
Before Judge A is a father of two girls, he works an average of 35 hours of overtime per week as a firefighter.  The children's mother has filed a Motion to Modify Child Support upward. 

Before Judge C is the father of a little boy and girl who works about 37 hours per week of overtime as a television station director.  Likewise, the mother of the children has filed a Motion to Modify Child Support upward.

Both fathers have roughly the same base income.

The hearings are held in each courtroom.  The father in Courtroom 5A comes out with a much smaller child support order than the father in Courtroom 5C despite the similarity of their circumstances.

The father before Judge C ended up with a greater child support payment because Judge C believes that regular overtime income should be considered when calculating child support.  Judge A does not believe that any time over forty (40) hours should be considered in child support calculations.

Same court, same court house, same system of justice completely different and inconsistent results.

If you were scheduled to be in Courtroom 5A and then due to an illness you were shifted to Courtroom 5C, would you be upset?

Would it make a difference if you were the mother as to which court you'd want to be in?


Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Recent Entries

Rhode Island Divorce Tip: On Judicial Bias
Rhode Island Divorces are hard enough without judicial bias.  Judicial bias is when a judge or magistrate in the position…