In my Rhode Island Divorce article called "Divorcing with Dignity" I alluded to the fact that when you divorce your spouse you have a better chance of doing so amicably with both spouses retaining their dignity rather than arguing, fighting and bickering at each other simply by retaining your power as the client to direct the focus of your divorce.
The title of that divorce article was to call to your attention as a divorcing party that there is more than one aspect to a divorce. Divorcing with Dignity focused its emphasis on the damage that can be done when emotions are triggered in one (or both) of the spouses and your case suddenly spirals out of control because either one or both of you are in a reactive rather than a responsive state of mind.
A reactive state of mind is present when a person simply reacts to something that is done or said by another person based solely on the emotions he or she feels about what has been said or done by their spouse.
A responsive state of mind is present when a person rationally processes what has been said or done by their spouse (which may or may not trigger strong emotions that urge you to react) and logically thinks through the situation in context.
In a reactive state in a divorce situation such as the one outlined in my article "Divorcing with Dignity" the spouse who was served with the Divorce Complaint immediately saw the words "sole custody" and became emotional. The spouse that was served might have interpreted that in several ways based upon a gut emotional reaction. The spouse that was served might have thought that "sole custody" meant that thee other spouse wanted to take away his or her rights. Or, the spouse that was served might have thought that the spouse who filed the divorce action lied and had no intention of being reasonable. Or, the spouse that was served might have thought it implied he or she was somehow incompetent or incapable of having custody.
Whatever the spouse who was served with the Divorce Complaint interpreted the request for "sole custody" to mean, that spouse's response was from a reactive state of mind. The spouse did not take time to rationally process what was contained in the Divorce Complaint. Rather, the spouse reacted emotionally and made statements to the other spouse in anger that may have been interpreted as threats, a lack of reasonableness, a lack of trust, an unwillingness to allow the spouse to explain and even as an accusation that the spouse filing the divorce was a liar.
Imagine now what happens in this case if the spouse who filed the divorce complaint and trusted the lawyer, also adopts a reactive state and becomes hurt and/or furious because the spouse wasn't even given the opportunity to explain that the words "sole custody" were put in the Divorce Complaint by the attorney who does so as a standard practice. The spouse who filed for divorce might not feel so amicable anymore. He or she might now be angry and furious that an explanation should have been allowed.
Now the spouse who was served may have triggered emotions in the spouse who filed the divorce to enter into a reactive state of mind as well. Now, both parties are emotional, mistrusting of one another and animosity has been created which may prevent you from amicably settling the divorce at all.
Regrettably I've seen this happen on many occasions and in some instances despite the best legal or mental health counseling you can't undo the damage that has been done or reverse the reactive states because they have gained too much momentum in the minds of one or both or the spouses.
So what are the consequences?
One or both spouses are likely to be in emotional states that make them uncomfortable in some way. It is almost certain that the spouses aren't in an emotional state that bears any resemblance to "happiness". This emotional discomfort causes the mind to be distracted and takes a toll on your body both emotionally and physically. Some medical professionals even believe that extended stressful situations such as divorce can lead to shortened lifespans as well as early greying, hairloss, nervous conditions and may trigger anxiety, panic disorders and even chronic clinical depression.
Once spouses begin to make reactive decisions in a divorce situation, there is a good chance that one or both spouses may continue that pattern and continue making reactive decisions.
What if we have children?
If you have children, especially if they live with you and are below their teen year, those children may
- Feel and absorb the tension between the spouses,
- May receive less love, care or attention from one or both spouses as they tend to focus more of their energies on the emotion war with their spouse in the divorce,
- They may feel or take the backlash of their parent's (s') emotions since as human beings we often misplace and misdirect our feelings and emotions and lash out at the people closest to us even though they are not the cause of these emotions,
- Be traumatized emotionally just by the possibility of losing a parent in their home environment,
- Become alienated from one of their parents if one parent has left the household and the other parent's misdirected emotions cause that parent to say and do things that foster in the child(ren) the idea that the other parent does not love them, does not care about them and has abandoned them.
So what can you do to ease your divorce?
This is an exerpt. To read the full article click here > AttorneyPearsall.com
Authored by:
Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI 02910
Phone: (401) 354-2369
Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.
NOTE: The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue. This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.
* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.