March 2008 Archives

An Insight into Divorce & Marriage by a Rhode Island Divorce Attorney

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Marriage is perhaps one of the most interesting ceremonies in our culture.  Many of us plan for months to get everything perfect.  Flowers, Catering, Food, Photographer, Wedding Dress, Tuxedos, Bridesmaid's Gowns, Picture Locations, Table Centerpieces, Reception Location, Transportation, Invitations, Bouquet, Wedding Rings, Honeymoon, Wedding location . . . and so much more.  Thousands of dollars are spent and hundreds of hours are spent all for a single day of formality for two people to stand up in front of their friends and family and become joined as husband and wife through a ceremony of their choosing.

Yet choosing a soul mate for life is about the hardest thing you will ever do and many people don't put half the time as it takes to plan a wedding into the actual selection of their chosen soul mate.  It's interesting.  It is as if our physiological feelings about someone when we're with them just seem to override everything and tell us . . . this is the person.  There's no real thought about it.   There's no balancing of the pros and cons about your preferences versus this other person's preferences.  It seems to be more your feelings and your interaction with that person at the time that govern your decision.

Strangely, this set of feelings about the person that lead us to marry them are the same things that leave us blind to those things about the person that annoy us or that we don't even bother to question until it is too late.  After all, marriage is supposed to be a life-long decision and commitment.  Yet so many times one or the other of the couple, or even both, are blind to the others flaws, many of which they couldn't live with for a lifetime.

It is not a wonder under circumstances like these that when such a massive decision as marriage is made with less consideration than say . . . buying a house for example . . .that more than 1 out of 2 marriages fail.

What is even more perplexing is that once the couple enters  the family court for their Rhode Island Divorce proceeding, they sometimes expect it to be severed and completed in a heartbeat.  What must be considered is that now the court must determine the conduct of the parties, whether children need to be provided for, whether there are pre-marital or non-marital assets, whether the parties can sustain themselves financially, what will be come of what assets, and whether one party should be given more assets or more debt than the other based on his or her conduct. 

Compare what the court must do to what it takes to plan a marriage and the time constraints and typical number of decisions can be fairly comparable to one another.

Is it possible for a marriage to happen overnight?  Almost.  Is it possible for a divorce to happen overnight?  Not in Rhode Island.  In the same way that there are many issues that should be considered by the parties before getting married, there are many questions and just as many answers that the Rhode Island Divorce Judge must come up with to insure both parties go their separate ways equitably.

The analogy, although possibly long winded.  Is that it takes time to get a divorce just as it takes time to plan a marriage.  The emotions may be different which may cause further divorce delays.  Yet parties in a divorce should plan to be patient otherwise they should plan for the process to take longer.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Get them Back to Work from a Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer

| 2 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

After eight (8) years as a Rhode Island lawyer dedicated to divorce and family law and another thirteen years in law here in Rhode Island, there is one situation that I have seen consistently and it almost always results in an unhappy husband paying alimony to his spouse.  The scenario goes pretty much like this one.

John and Melissa get married and have a child.  Melissa stays home to take care of the child because daycare expenses would be too costly and Melissa doesn't want her child raised by someone else.  Melissa promises that when the child gets into school full time that she will get a job or return to work to help with the family income.  The day comes when the child is in full time school and Melissa refuses to go back to work.  She wants to be able to bring the child to school, participate in school events during the day and pick the child up after school.  This situation often ends with a very upset husband and may eventually lead to the husband filing for divorce. 

John files for divorce and Melissa who has not been working for years seeks alimony and child support as the primary caregiver for the child.  John is upset.  John can't understand it.   He pulled the financial weight for his family for years and now when he wants to get out of the relationship he might be expected to pay for several more years. 

Why?   

Just because Melissa stayed home with their child and refused to return to work as she had agreed to help out their little family?

The answer is a resounding "NO".

It is not because Melissa broke her promise.

Practically speaking it is because John allowed her to stay home without contributing to the household income.

Many families are economical.  Attorneys understand that.  Yes, I understand that.  However, everyone should take into consideration that more than one out of every two marriages end in divorce.

When you have that kind of figure working against you then you have to consider the consequences if your marriage happens to be one of those that don't make it.

So what is the answer?  Families need two incomes even if it means the majority of one income goes to daycare for a while.  Women can earn as much as men these days and the old ways of the mother just staying home with the child are disappearing.  Frankly, they should be.

The answer to John's predicament and for many other men is to get the mother out and working for your financial future as soon as possible after the child is born.  It is not a right of a mother to stay home with the child any more than it is a right of the father not to pull his weight with diaper changing and late night feedings.

In the end, if John, or you, or your neighbor Tim, is one of those two marriages that isn't going to make it for 50 years or so and you end up in Rhode Island Divorce Court, then if you let the mother stay at home with the child then prepare to pay alimony for a few years.  At that juncture you have no one to blame.  You should be informed.  We balance the pros and cons on house buying.  We also do it on whether we take a job or not.  Why shouldn't we expect to do it with a marriage?  After all, isn't it one of the biggest decisions in our lives?!

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer on Divorce Appeal Standards

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

There are two important standards that laypeople should know, especially if they hire an attorney to protect their interests.

1.  You are not protected so that you can appeal if your attorney does not place your issues "on the record".  In a divorce or family court proceeding issues are "on the record" if they are taken down by the stenographer.  What does this mean?  It means that chambers conferences where the court stenographer is not present and taking down the information discussed in the judge's chambers are not "on the record".  It means that discussions with the judge at the bench in court are not "on the record" unless the judge specifically tells the court stenographer to take down the information.

2.  When you are protected with items that are "on the record", if you have to appeal any particular issue, the Rhode Island Supreme Court has consistently ruled that they will not address an issue that is raised for the first time on appeal.  In other words it wasn't "on the record" . . . and . . . the Rhode Island Supreme Court has also consistently ruled that it will give great deference to the trial judge as the trier of fact (since he or she was the person in the best position to evaluate the demeanor, character and testimony of the witnesses) and the factual findings of the trial judge  will not be disturbed absent some gross inaccuracy.  The trial judge's determinations of law will be upheld unless it is shown on appeal that the trial judge clearly abused his or her discretion when applying the law or the facts to the law.

Every litigant before the Rhode Island Family Court should keep in mind whether they are financially able to appeal issues if the trial judge does not rule their way.  If so, those same litigants should be vigilant that major issues are placed "on the record" and aren't discussed at the bench or behind closed doors in a chamber's conference.  If your attorney doesn't preserve your issues for appeal on the record if you lose, what was the point of beginning the battle to begin with?  Just the chance of winning the very first time?

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Yes, the sale of the marital home can be deferred if certain conditions are met.  Generally speaking, the court will defer the sale of the marital home in a divorce when, after considering the finances of the parties, there are enough financial resources to sustain the home, both parties can still sustain reasonable standards of living, and deferring the home is in the best interests of the minor child(ren).

The definitions and actual standard as provided by law are set forth in Rhode Island General Laws §15-5-16.1.1 which is as follows:

§ 15-5-16.1.1  Deferment of sale of home. – (a) As used in this section, the following words and terms have the following meanings unless the context indicates another or different meaning or intent:

   (1) "Custodial parent" means a party awarded physical custody of a child.

   (2) "Deferred sale of home order" means an order that temporarily delays the sale and awards the temporary exclusive use and possession of the family home to a custodial parent of minor children, or children for whom support is authorized under this chapter, whether or not the custodial parent has sole or joint custody, in order to minimize the adverse impact of divorce on the welfare of the children.

   (3) "Resident parent" means a party who has requested or who has already been awarded a deferred sale of home order.

   (b) In any case in which one of the parties has requested a deferred sale of home order pursuant to this section, the court shall first determine whether it is economically feasible to maintain the payments of any note secured by a mortgage or other liens, property taxes, or insurance for the home during the period the sale of the home is deferred. In making this determination, the court shall consider the resident parent's income, the availability of spousal support, child support, or both spousal and child support, and any other sources of funds available to make those payments. The intent in requiring this determination is to avoid defaults on the payments of notes and resulting foreclosures, to avoid inadequate insurance coverage, to prevent deterioration of the condition of the family home, and to prevent any other circumstances which would jeopardize both parents' equity in the home. After making the determination that it is economically feasible to consider ordering a deferred sale of the family home, the court in exercising its discretion to grant or deny a deferred sale of home order, shall consider whether it is in the best interest of the child or children.

   (c) Upon a determination pursuant to subsection (b) of this section that a deferred sale of home order is indicated in order to minimize the adverse impact of divorce on the child, the court may make such an order. The order shall include the duration of the order, may include the legal description and assessor's plat and lot number of the real property which is subject to the order, and may be recorded in the office of the registry of deeds of the city or town in which the real property is located.

   (d) The court may make an order specifying the parties' respective responsibilities for the payment of the costs of routine maintenance and capital improvements.

   (e) Except as otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing, the following shall apply:

   (1) A deferred sale of home order may be modified or terminated at any time at the discretion of the court.

   (2) If the party awarded the deferred sale of home order remarries, or if there is otherwise a change in circumstances affecting the determinations made pursuant to subsection (b) of this section or affecting the economic status of the parties or the children on which the award is based, a rebuttable presumption, affecting the burden of proof, is created that further deferral of the sale is no longer an equitable method of minimizing the adverse impact of the divorce on the children.

   (f) In making an order pursuant to this section, the court shall reserve jurisdiction to determine any and all issues that arise with respect to the deferred sale of home order including, but not limited to, the maintenance of the home and the tax consequences to each party.

  • Published at the Rhode Island General Assembly Website

Equity Loans are very similar to mortgages. Usually they are loans secured by something of value, traditionally a piece of real estate that is worth more than the loan being taken out. A mortgage for an equity loan is typically recorded and though it can be a first mortgage on the property, it is often a second mortgage.

Equity loans can also be extended upon other collateral of value, such as bonds, stocks, valuable business equipment, jewelry and the like.

Fred has been married to Rachel for 26 years. Over the years they have accumulated a nice house along the water which is paid off. Fred has a 22 Foot Scooner that has a galley kitchen and sleeps six (6). Rachel has four (4) collectible fur coats that she has kept in mint condition and lots of diamond jewelry including necklaces, anklets, bracelets and rings that she only wears for special occasions.

Fred has kept the finances, but he hasn't done it very well and after he and Rachel retire, he realizes they have no liquid cash coming in to sustain their lifestyle.

Fred panics as Rachel tells him she's going shopping at Carte Blanche. Scrambling to figure out what to do Fred finds the deed to his schooner and grabs the three most valuable peices of jewelry that he bought for Rachel.

While Rachel is gone Fred runs out and has the jewelry appraised and gets a value assigned to his Scooner. Fred then runs down to Focus One Finance and applies for a loan by pledging the equity in the jewelry and his schooner. Focus One Finance holds the title to the schooner and records a lienholder statement against it. Focus One Finance also holds the jewelry and tell Fred that he'll get all of this back when he satisfies his Equity Loan terms. Focus One Finance wires $85,000 to Fred's bank just in time for Rachel to make a purchase with her MasterMoney Card.

Fred rushes back home feeling that he has put an end to the crisis.

Two weeks later Fred gets his first Equity Loan Statement. He doesn't want to pay it out of the monies he got so he puts it in a drawer. A month later another statement comes with a double payment due and penalty fees. Again Fred stuffs it in the drawer, not wanting to deal with it at this time.

Finally in the third month Fred knows he can't avoid this anymore, but rather than pay the statement he waits until Rachel is out of the house and he takes her two best fur coats and runs down to Focus One Financial. At first Fred offers them as payment and tells Focus One that the fur coats are worth much more than the payments due, but Focus One Financial wants payment ...they do not want to barter. Financial Focus One states that the best it can do is re-finance his loan and capitalize the interest and penalties and hold the garments as additional collateral since he did not make the first three payments. Fred agrees and returns home.

A week later Fred and Rachel are invited to a formal dinner event. Rachel immediately notices that several of her best peices of jewelry are gone and so are her fur coats. Rachel insists on calling the police but Fred urges her to keep looking. After about an hour, Fred breaks down and tells Rachel the whole story. Rachel is furious! She demands that he go right down and get her furs and her jewelry back immediately. Fred goes to Focus One Financial but they will not release the items until he fulfills the Equity Loan. Fred checks the checkbook. There is only $5,300 remaining in the account. Fred goes back and checks all the entries and they are all purchases that Rachel made for herself.

Fred returns to explain to Rachel why he can't get the items back. Rachel quickly packs a suitcase, takes her debt card and their check book and leaves.

The next afternoon Fred is served with divorce papers. Fred goes down to the bank to get some monies to hire an attorney. The ATM gives him $300 and then says $0 balance. Rachel had withdrawn the other $5,000, presumably to hire her attorney.

How might this mess be dealt with by the Rhode Island Divorce Court?

Fred didn't tell Rachel about the equity loan. Is Rachel likely to be held responsible for the equity loan given that circumstance?

Fred pledged Rachel's jewelry and fur coats as collateral against the equity loan. In the divorce proceeding could Rachel get them back from Focus One Financial without paying off the equity loan?

Rachel used up virtually every dime of the equity loan money. Even if Rachel didn't know where the monies came from, might she be held responsible for the loan as well since she received the benefit of the monies?

Is the Equity Loan a marital debt such that the Rhode Island Family Court has the power to determine its apportionment and assignment, or does Fred's conduct in deceiving Rachel render this his own private debt?

There are three (3) other issues (Questions) in this case that you should spot.  Can you see them?

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

What Results Can You Expect from a Seasoned Rhode Island Divorce Attorney?

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

During the course of my practice as a family law attorney I have represented a considerable number of people in a post-judgment capacity. In several cases I had the opportunity to review divorce judgments by other attorneys. When reviewing the divorce judgments both for background and for the sake of substantive arguments I noted several provisions that were clearly contrary to the client's interests. The provisions also had a substantial affect on the client's rights and what he or she was entitled to at the time of the divorce.

In four (4) separate instances I took time to question the client or prospective client how and why several particularly adverse clauses and orders were included in the divorce judgment. In three (3) of the cases the client or prospective client told me that the attorney he or she had hired had told the person that this was the best they were going to do even if they went to trial, or that this is the way it has to be, or this is the way it is done.

The fourth person indicated that he or she was so upset that he/she didn't care what happened and that the attorney didn't bother to explain to him or her what was going to happen.

The purpose of this page entry is to inform Rhode Island and the public that no family law attorney should be giving you a guarantee of any kind whatsoever regarding a divorce, separation or family law matter regarding the RESULT of any proceeding.

I will tell you that most Rhode Island Family Law Attorneys might disagree with me because it is a virtual certainty that if a person wants a divorce, they are virtually assured of getting one absent some procedural or jurisdictional issue that prevents the divorce.

When it comes to the RESULTS of family court matters, attorneys are not decision makers. We are advocates. It is either parties or judicial authorities like judges and magistrates that make the decisions.

People should be very wary of attorneys in divorce matters who allow a client to decline legal custody or to abandon any portion of the marital assets.

One case in point sticks in my mind from a case I read:

Bill was a primary caregiver of his three sons. He was a Mister Mom and took care of the children full-time for five (5) years while the mom built a career in the corporate world making over $100,000 per year. The parties divorced. They had a house, a joint bank account, and retirement accounts. After Bill's attorney made his recommendations, Bill had no legal custody, received nothing from the joint bank account, received nothing from the equity of the house and signed over the house to his wife, and received nothing from the retirement accounts. Bill received visitation every other weekend but had to drive three (3) hours each way to exercise his visitation with no provision that his wife had to do any of the driving. Perhaps most significantly, Bill was advised simply to waive alimony because men never get alimony. Bill did get his personal clothing and a payment of $10,000 to move out of the marital home.

Bill's attorney apparently told Bill that this was the best he could do.

As I've written about in other articles, if you have a divorce, hire a family law attorney who regularly practices in the family courts throughout Rhode Island.

My humble opinion?  Bill got shafted.  Bill didn't hire a family law attorney.

 

 

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Issues Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers Face.

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

The Rhode Island Family Court deals with numerous issues in divorces. There are primary issues that judge's handle on a daily basis that everyone should be aware of.

In understanding these issues it is good to know that the area of Family Law grew out of Contract law. It's fairly easy to see how this occurred. Generally speaking, a man makes an offer to a woman to marry him and be his one and only wife. A woman accepts that offer and promises to marry the man from the offer that he has made her. Traditionally an engagement ring is given to the woman by the man to seal that promise and make it known to others. Later, sometimes with or without a ceremony, formal promises are exchanged between the man and the woman before an officiant. Wedding rings and vows (promises) are exchanged and a marriage certificate is signed by both parties and filed with the State.

It's not hard to see how family law, particularly divorce, grew out of contract law. Though contract law is very diverse and has taken on great depth, it's foundations mirror the marriage process. In a contract there are at least two parties. One party makes an offer. The other party accepts the offer. Usually a document memorializing the promises is signed by both parties, sometimes before witnesses.

Just as there are issues when one of the parties does not live up to their part of a contract. There are also issues that must be addressed when a divorce occurs because it is the division of a marriage contract.

Legal Issues in Rhode Island Divorces

1.  Jurisdiction - Jurisdiction is the power of the court to decide a case based on its authority over the subject matter and the person's involved. The court must make a finding that it has the power over a cause of action, in this case a divorce. Subject matter jurisdiction for divorce is defined by statute in Rhode Island, namely that the Rhode Island Family Court has the jurisdiction to hear divorce cases. The court must also make a finding that it has authority over the persons involved in the action. Personal Jurisdiction is also defined by the Rhode Island Statutes in two ways. Assuming that we're dealing with a divorce based on Irreconcilable Differences, the court must find that one of the parties has been a continuously domiciled resident and inhabitant for the period of at least one year immediately prior to the filing of his or her Complaint or Counterclaim for Divorce, Additionally, the non-filing party must be served by a person authorized by law with the Divorce Complaint and any extraneous documents required by law.

2.  Legal Custody - Legal custody is the legal right of a parent or guardian to make decisions for a child in major areas of the child's life including health, education, religion, and the child's general welfare. The court must make a finding as to whether the parents of any minor children born of the marriage are fit and proper persons to have legal custody of the minor children. Then the court must make a ruling as to who should be awarded legal custody of the minor child or children.

3.  Placement - Placement is the right of a parent or guardian to have a minor child physically living with him or her. The court must make a ruling as to who a child should be placed with/live with. Underlying that court's ruling is the finding that the court's ruling regarding the placement of the minor child(ren) is in the best interests of the minor child(ren).

4.  Child Support - Child Support is the right of a child to be supported by his legal parents or guardians. It is calculated using the Gross Incomes of the parents or guardians of the minor child(ren) and applying them to the Rhode Island Child Support Guidelines. The placement parent is typically the recipient of the child support while the non-placement parent is the payer or the child support. The court must determine the number of children, the gross income of the parties and the amount of child support that is due to the children and must be paid by the non-placement parent.

5.  Equitable Distribution - Equitable Distribution is the family court's equitable division of the assets of the marriage (marital assets) and who should be entitled to what asset or what portion of an asset; and equitable division of all the debts of the marriage (marital debts) and who should be responsible for which debts or what portion of what debt. When apportioning the marital assets and debts of a couple, the family court looks a various factors, including, but not limited to, the length of the marriage, the contribution of each of the parties, and the conduct of the parties during the course of the marriage, to name a few.

6.  Alimony - Alimony is support that one spouse may be ordered to pay to the other spouse. In Rhode Island, alimony is rehabilitative in nature. Alimony is therefore only to be awarded to a person who needs to rehabilitate his or her skills in order to be able to enter or re-enter the workplace at a level of income that can allow him or her to survive. In awarding alimony the court will look at the job history, age, education, skills and the current marketplace to determine if the spouse is in need of rehabilitation. The courts will also look to the contribution of the former spouse to the needs of the person seeking alimony as well as the actual monetary needs of the person seeking alimony and may take into consideration the cost of the rehabilitation.

7.  Health Coverage - This issue is self-explanatory. Health coverage is a major issue these days not only for adults but especially for children. If none is made, the Rhode Island Family Court will make inquiry as to who has provided medical coverage for the couple (or family) in the past and endeavor to make provisions for how medical coverage will continue in the future for both spouses, if possible. The court has particular concern for the continued coverage of minor children and is uniquely aware that not all healthcare costs are covered by insurance, and therefore if it is not brought up by the parties during a divorce proceeding then the court will order provisions in its decree for how the uncovered, uninsured or unreimbursed medical expenses of the minor children will be paid. Generally speaking the court will order each parent to pay a portion of each expense incurred.

8.  Visitation - Visitation is the right of the non-placement parent to have physical placement of the minor child or children, usually for a specified amount of time, or under specified conditions in more extreme cases, before returning the child(ren) to the non-placement parent. When the family court determines visitation for the non-placement parent, the judge will usually consider the age of the child(ren), the amount of prior involvement of the parent, the suitability of the home environment the child(ren) would be spending their visitation in, and any history of violence or criminal conduct relevant to the children or the other spouse. The court encourages spouses to work together to positively reinforce minor children that their place in the family unit is still in tact, it is simply that the parents could not live together happily anymore. Visitation is encouraged by the court as long as it is conducive to productive behavior and reinforces a healthy attitude in the minor children. However, the court will step in and make appropriate orders if it becomes apparent that the visitation is doing more harm than good.

9.  Irreconcilable Differences - This is the basis used by the vast majority of people who file for divorce. The full basis is that there have arisen between the parties irreconcilable differences which have led to the irremediable breakdown of the marriage. This is a fundamental determination made my the court. The court must find, through the testimony, that the parties had differences, that those differences were irreconcilable, that the marriage has broken down, that the cause of the breakdown was these differences, and finally that the marriage is irremediably broken such that the spouses can no longer live as husband and wife. Naturally there are other basis for divorce, however since this is the most frequently used, it is included here for your information.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce - Affairs as a Fault Basis for Divorce

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Laypeople and even Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers have argued with me that Rhode Island is a "No Fault" state.  A "No Fault" state essentially means that Rhode Island does not recognize grounds that would cause one party to be more at fault for the breakdown of the marriage than the other spouse.

This is not correct.  Rhode Island does recognize fault based grounds for divorce, including adultery, habitual drunkeness, and conduct repugnant to the marriage covenant.

However, the focus of this article is upon an affair and how it fits into a fault based divorce.  This of course relates to adultery during the marriage.  Yet there is a little more to it when it comes to arguments offered by an attorney on behalf of his or her client.

Examples are best illustrative of the type of cases I refer to.

John and Lizzy are married and can't get along.  John moves out to clear his head and get some individual counseling to help his marriage.  After five months of counseling John comes to the conclusion that Lizzy is not the right woman for him.  John meets with Lizzy to tell her that he will be filing for divorce.  Lizzy is furious.  Unexpectedly John meets a nice young woman and they have intercourse.  John hires an attorney to file for divorce.  Lizzy, however, files first and alleges adultery and that John had an affair.

What is the practical impact of the events between John and Lizzy?

Did John have an affair?  Absolutely!

Did John commit adultery?  Absolutely!

Was John's adulterous affair the cause of the breakdown of the marriage?  Any attorney arguing on behalf of John should be arguing "Absolutely NOT"!

It is possible to affair that is adulterous (i.e. intercourse during a marriage with a woman that is not your wife) and yet it is not properly a basis for the divorce because it was not the cause of the breakdown of the marriage.

In order for an adulterous affair to be properly a basis for fault and the grounds for divorce, it must be the cause of the breakdown of the marriage.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Child Support Lawyer - The Child Support Law

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

It may be helpful for those trying to understand Rhode Island Child Support to actually have the Rhode Island Child Support Statute in front of you.  In fact, if you have to go before the court to a hearing on child support it is best to either know the statute very well or to take a copy of it with you.

The official citation is Rhode Island General Laws §15-5-16.2

§ 15-5-16.2  Child support. – (a) In a proceeding for divorce, divorce from bed and board, a miscellaneous petition without the filing of divorce proceedings, or child support, the court shall order either or both parents owing a duty of support to a child to pay an amount based upon a formula and guidelines adopted by an administrative order of the family court. If, after calculating support based upon court established formula and guidelines, the court, in its discretion, finds the order would be inequitable to the child or either parent, the court shall make findings of fact and shall order either or both parents owing a duty of support to pay an amount reasonable or necessary for the child's support after considering all relevant factors including, but not limited to:

   (1) The financial resources of the child;

   (2) The financial resources of the custodial parent;

   (3) The standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the marriage not been dissolved;

   (4) The physical and emotional condition of the child and his or her educational needs; and

   (5) The financial resources and needs of the non-custodial parent.

   (b) The court may, if in its discretion it deems it necessary or advisable, order child support and education costs for children attending high school at the time of their eighteenth (18th) birthday and for ninety (90) days after graduation, but in no case beyond their nineteenth (19th) birthday. In addition, the court may order child support to continue, in the case of a child with a severe physical or mental impairment, until the twenty-first (21st) birthday of the child.

   (c) The court may, if in its discretion it deems it necessary or advisable, appoint an attorney or a guardian ad litem to represent the interest of a minor or dependent child with respect to his or her support, custody, and visitation.

   (i) In determining whether an appointment should be made, the court shall consider the extent to which a guardian ad litem may assist in providing information concerning the best interest of the child; the age of the child; the wishes of the parents as well as their financial resources; the nature of the proceeding including the level of contentiousness, allegations of child abuse or domestic violence and the risk of harm to the child if a guardian is not appointed; or conflicts of interest between the child and parents or siblings;

   (ii) The guardian ad litem shall be appointed from a list of persons properly credentialed pursuant to administrative orders of the chief judge of the family court;

   (iii) The court shall enter an order of appointment stating the specific assignment the optional and mandatory duties of the guardian ad litem, the guardian's access to the child and confidential information regarding the child, and a provision for payment of the costs and fees of the guardian ad litem;

   (iv) Communications made to a guardian, including those made by a child, are not privileged and may or may not be disclosed to the parties, the court or to professionals providing services to the child or the family;

   (v) The guardian ad litem shall meet with the child, conduct an investigation and upon request of the court shall prepare an oral or written report that contains the procedural background of the case, identification of all persons interviewed and other sources of information, a statement of the child's emotional, medical, educational and social service needs, the child's wishes and other factors relevant to the court's determination regarding the best interests of the child;

   (vi) Any written report of the guardian ad litem shall be marked as a full exhibit in the proceedings, subject to cross-examination;

   (vii) If the guardian ad litem requests confidential health care information and consent is withheld, he or she shall apply to the court for leave to obtain such information after compliance with § 5-37.3-6.1;

   (viii) The guardian ad litem shall be given notice of and should appear at all proceedings in family court that affect the interests of the child;

   (ix) A person serving as a guardian ad litem under this section acts as the court's agent and is entitled to quasi-judicial immunity for acts performed within the scope of the duties of the guardian ad litem;

   (x) The chief judge of the family court shall issue, through administrative orders, rules governing the appointment and performance of guardians ad litem in domestic proceedings.

   (2) After a decree for support has been entered, the court may from time to time upon the petition of either party review and alter its decree relative to the amount of support and the payment of it, and may make any decree relative to it which it might have made in the original suit. The decree may be made retroactive in the court's discretion only to the date that notice of a petition to modify was given to the adverse party if the court finds that a substantial change in circumstances has occurred; provided, that the court shall set forth in its decision the specific findings of fact which show a substantial change in circumstances and upon which findings of facts the court has decided to make the decree retroactive.

   (d) In a proceeding to enforce a child support order, or a spousal support order for a custodial parent having custody of a minor child, the court or its magistrate may assign to the obligee such tangible personal property of the obligor that will be sufficient to satisfy the child or spousal support arrearage owed. The court or its magistrate, after a hearing, shall establish the amount of the child or spousal support arrearage, and the nature and value of the tangible personal property. To effect the assignment, the court or its magistrate may order the obligor to execute and deliver the documents of title which may be necessary to complete the transfer of title to the property, and may order the obligor to deliver possession of the property to the obligee. Whenever the obligor fails to comply with the order assigning the property, the order of assignment shall be regarded as a judgment vesting title to the property in the obligor as fully and completely as if the obligor had executed and delivered the documents of title.

   (2) Any order for child support issued by the family court shall contain a provision requiring either or both parents owing a duty of support to a child to obtain health insurance coverage for the child when coverage is available to the parent or parents through their employment without cost or at a reasonable cost. "Reasonable cost" shall be defined in accordance with guidelines adopted by administrative order of the family court in conjunction with the child support guidelines.

   (3) Any existing child support orders may be modified in accordance with this subsection unless the court makes specific written findings of fact that take into consideration the best interests of the child and conclude that a child support order or medical order would be unjust or inappropriate in a particular case.

   (4) In addition, the national medical support notice shall be issued with respect to all orders issued, enforced, or modified on or after October 1, 2002, in accordance with chapter 29 of title 15. The notice shall inform the employer of provisions in the child support order, for health care coverage for the child, and contain instructions on how to implement this coverage. In lieu of the court ordering the non-custodial parent to obtain or maintain health care coverage for the child, the court may order the non-custodial parent to contribute a weekly cash amount towards the medical premium for health care coverage paid by the state of Rhode Island and/or the custodial parent. The method to determine a reasonable weekly amount shall be addressed in the family court administrative order pertaining to the child support guidelines.

   (e) In a proceeding to establish support, the court in its discretion may, after opportunity for a hearing, issue a temporary order for child support payable into the registry of the court and to be held pending entry of judgment. In the event of a final adjudication requiring no payment or payments in an amount less than those payments which have been made pursuant to a temporary order under this section, the defendant shall be entitled to a refund of all or a portion of the amounts paid.

   (f) In any proceeding to establish support, or in any case in which an obligor owes past due support, for a child or children receiving public assistance pursuant to chapter 5.1 of title 40, the court or its magistrate, upon a finding that an able bodied absent parent obligor is unemployed, underemployed or lacks sufficient income or resources from which to make payment of support equal to the public assistance payment for the child or children, or is unable to pay the arrearages in accordance with a payment plan, may order that parent to perform unpaid community service for at least twenty (20) hours per week through community service placements arranged and supervised by the department of human services and/or the division of taxation within the department of administration or to participate in any work activities that the court deems appropriate. The performance of community service shall not be a basis for retroactive suspension of arrears due and owing.

   (g) In any proceeding to establish support for a minor child whose adjudicated parent is a minor (minor-parent), the court or its magistrate may order a grandparent of the minor child to reimburse the department of human services in an amount not to exceed the total amount of cash assistance benefits paid to or for the minor child pursuant to chapter 5.1 of title 40 until the minor-parent reaches the age of eighteen (18), less any payment made to the department by the minor parent.

   (2) The obligation of reimbursement for the minor child shall be the joint and several responsibility of the minor parent and the grandparent(s) until the minor parent reaches the age of eighteen (18); provided, that each joint obligor shall have a right of contribution against each joint obligor, which right shall be enforceable by an action in the family court.

   (h) All support orders established or modified in the state on or after October 1, 1998, shall be recorded with the Rhode Island family court/department of administration, division of taxation child support computer enforcement system, which maintains the official registry of support orders entered in accordance with applicable administrative orders issued by the Rhode Island family court. The support order shall be recorded whether or not services are being provided under the IV-D state plan.

   (2) The obligee to a paternity or child support proceeding shall be required to file with the family court, upon the entry of the order, the appropriate form as provided by family court which includes the full name of the parties, residential and mailing address, telephone number, drivers license number, social security number and the name, address and telephone number of the employer. The form shall also include the full order amount and date and amount of arrearages if any, the name of the child(ren), their date of birth, address and social security number and any other information as required by administrative order.

   (3) After this, each party is required to file an amended form whenever any of the information contained on the original form has been changed in any way, within ten (10) days of the change. The information shall be entered in the child support enforcement computer system within five (5) business days of receipt of the amended form.

   (i) In any subsequent child support enforcement action between the parties, upon sufficient showing that diligent effort has been made to ascertain the location of such a party, the court may deem state due process requirements for notice and service of process to be met with respect to the party, upon service by first class mail or, where appropriate, by service as specified in the Rhode Island rules of procedure for domestic relations for the Family Court of Rhode Island, of written notice to the most recent residential or employer address of record.

Paying for your Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Paying for your Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer doesn't come cheap depending upon who you hire.  Many people feel trapped and unable to file for divorce simply because they don't have the monies to hire a decent Rhode Island Family Lawyer.

However, if you have a credit card, whether it is in your own name or jointly held with your spouse, that credit card can be used to hire the lawyer.

Now most people might worry because all they believe they are doing is increasing their debt.  However, there are a few considerations that may outweigh the use of a credit card to pay for the attorney who will represent your rights.

First, if you don't hire the attorney, might you take a greater loss on your rights than the amount you are putting on the credit card.  Second, if your spouse has an attorney or even if he doesn't, isn't it reasonable to claim that the hiring of the attorney was a necessary expense to help the marriage come to its conclusion fairly and equitably?  Both issues are more than reasonable and it is an entirely valid argument to make to the court that the charge for your attorney was reasonable and necessary and therefore it is a marital debt just like any other.  This is especially true if your spouse was the party filing for the divorce.

If you need to hire a lawyer for your divorce and your only recourse is a credit card, it is probably your best bet to use the card, protect your rights and hire a decent family law attorney.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

A Rhode Island Lawyer's Story about a Business in an RI Divorce Case.

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Tom has a small label-making business that makes about $24,000 a year working on the weekends. He has been in business for about 6 years but hasn't been able to increase the revenues from the business above $24,000 a year. Tom meets Phoebe but after three (3) years Tom realizes it was a mistake and he files for divorce.

They didn't have any children and both Tom and Phoebe have jobs that make them roughly $45,000 each.

Phoebe didn't work in Tom's business and didn't contribute to it financially during their marriage so Tom says she's not entitled to any part of the business, especially since it is in the same position it was before they even met.

Phoebe agrees. They try to put through their divorce on their own. The Final Judgment of Divorce is entered and says in Paragraph 7,

    7.  Phoebe does not have any interest in Tom's business which existed before this marriage.

 

Tom and Phoebe figure they are finally divorced and everything is done and over with.

Six months later Phoebe loses her job and has no money. Phoebe's mother sends her to an attorney friend of hers and Phoebe learns that she probably was entitled to a portion of Tom's business prior to the entry of the Final Judgment of Divorce.

The Rhode Island attorney explains that she still may be entitled to a portion of Tom's business even now but it will be much harder and much more costly to pursue.

The Rhode Island attorney asks why she didn't just get a divorce attorney to represent her in the divorce proceeding because this most likely would have been caught then.

What is pre-marital property for purposes of a Rhode Island Divorce? 

Seems like a pretty straight-forward question to address in a Rhode Island Divorce, doesn't it? You'd think that it is just property that either spouse owned prior to the marriage. Makes logical sense doesn't it?!?

I've often wondered if the law needs to complicate things or if it's provisions just lend us a helping hand. Yet for whatever reason, it does. Perhaps it is simply that the law must take into account as many of life's circumstances as possible and give the Judge's a bit of a rest from all the emotions which, of course, run high in the family court on a daily basis.

In any event, pre-marital property isn't always that simple. For instance, if you take a premarital item, like a pool table you owned before you got married, and you put it in a marital home with everyone (husband, wife and kids) and everyone uses it for 15 years, is it still a pre-marital asset? Or could it be that by putting it in the home and using it as a family that the owner of the item caused it to lose its "pre-marital" quality and has converted it into a "marital asset."

Consider this example and see what you think:

Jim and Cindy each owned real estate in their own separate names. They got married in 1995 and in 1996 they bought another piece of property to live in while they rented out their separate houses that they owned prior to the marriage. Both Jim and Cindy had separate bank accounts and put the rental monies from their houses into their own personal accounts. Jim did not put Cindy on his bank account and Cindy didn't put Jim on her bank account. They agreed to keep their bank accounts separate.

While they are living in their marital home they each take money from their weekly incomes and put it into a joint checking account to pay for their bills on their marital home?

In 2008 Cindy and Jim agree to have an amicable divorce.  Cindy files for divorce.  Jim files his counterclaim for divorce.

To be on the safe side Jim hires a lawyer who his recommended by a friend to give him advice about his divorce. Unbeknownst to Jim, his lawyer primarily focuses his practice on commercial real estate closings.

During the divorce Cindy discovers that Jim hasn't been quite faithful to her for the last three years of their marriage and has been having an affair with their next door neighbor, Sharon.

Cindy is upset and wants to punish Jim for his infidelity. Cindy hires a full-time family law attorney who discovers that Jim has been paying his water ad sewer taxes as well as his property insurance for his separate house out of their joint account.

Cindy's divorce attorney makes a claim that Jim's house is a marital asset because he used their joint account and therefore both of their monies were used to maintain Jim's house. Cindy's attorney checks into her finances and how she maintained her separate house and finds that everything appears to have been kept separate and therefore he maintains that Cindy's house is most certainly pre-marital.

Since infidelity is normally only considered by the court when apportioning the marital assets of the parties and not as a basis to "punish" an offending party, what, if anything, could Jim argue to get his separate house out of this mess and return it to a pre-marital status?

Is there anything that Jim could look into that might bring Cindy's separate house into the scope of a marital asset that the court has the power to distribute?

If Cindy contributed only half of what Jim did to the the joint checking account, is Jim entitled to use that extra contribution to pay minor expenses on his separate house?

If Cindy was on disability for a time and Jim leant Cindy money to make the mortgage payments on her separate house for several months, does that make any difference?

If Cindy put on a new addition to her separate house but she did so by a credit application that stated Jim's income as a means of paying back the loan, does that matter if Jim didn't sign the loan application?

These are just a few of the many questions that arise with premarital property under Rhode Island Divorce Law.

There are at least 3 other more direct issues raised by this scenario.  Can you spot them?

If you had an item of significant value in your life and you didn't want to lose it or be ordered to sell it by the court, could it possibly be worth the price of a Rhode Island Divorce attorney to give you the best chance at saving that item?

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce Attorney - Thoughts on Inheritances!

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Rhode Island divorce and inheritances can and often do become a little more complicated than most parties in a divorce action would like. As with most divorces there can be quite a bit of emotion by one party or both and the instinctual nature of the parties is to try to apply common sense to what should happen to an inheritance in a divorce. Many times that common sensical approach can be right. Yet it's the job of lawyers to make our best arguments in an effort to achieve the best possible results for our clients.

Consider this scenario of an inheritance issue.

Drake and Colleen have been married for fifteen (15) years. They have several children and get along famously with Drake's parents who have a grand home in Narragansett, Rhode Island. In the early years of their marriage Drake, Colleen and their children frequently visited Drake's parents and stayed with them in their Narragansett home.

While both of the Drake's parents are alive they spoke with Drake and Colleen and told them, in the presence of several witnesses, that they would amend their wills and that when they die Drake and Colleen will inherit the Narragansett property.

Drake's mother passes away suddenly and the visits to Narragansett become less frequent.

Drake has grown out of love with Colleen and he files for divorce in Providence Family Court. While the divorce proceedings are pending Drake's father passes away leaving the Narragansett home and a $20,000 bank account solely to Drake.

Now ask yourself if you know the answers to these legal questions:

Can Colleen claim an interest in the Narragansett home if she can produce one or more witnesses who heard the Drake parents talk about amending their Wills?

Does it make any difference that Drake's parent's used the word "would" when talking about amending their Wills instead of the words "should" or "will"?

Would it matter if Colleen heard the real estate taxes were coming due on the Narragansett home and she ran down to the tax collector's office in Narragansett and paid the first quarter of the taxes without Drake knowing it?

Assume that Drake wants to use the $20,000 bank account he inherited to make badly needed repairs to the Narragansett home. Drake puts the $20,000 into his joint bank account with Colleen temporarily (only for two weeks) before transferring the monies into a new account that is just in his own name. Does this pose any issues with the monies?

What issues might this pose with the Narragansett home, if any?    

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce - When is a Gift really a Gift?

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Did you ever think that a gift that you were given could become a contentious part of your Rhode Island Divorce? Most people would never even think of it because gifts, on the surface, are very straight-forward. I mean, just think about it. There is the person giving the gift and that person is considered to be the owner of that object. Then there is the person receiving the gift. Once the person who is giving the item gives it to the person they want to receive the item as a gift then it becomes the property of the person they gave it too. Now you'd expect that the one who receives the gift is the new owner, plain and simple and it has nothing to do with the marriage at all.

This is where everyday thinking and the law diverge because in many cases it is not as simple as people would like to keep it. Why is that? Because the law has standards of proof regarding gifts and what happens to the gift after it is given to the receiving party in a marriage can unknowingly change the item from a "gift" to an "asset of the marital estate".

If you've never heard the phrase, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse." It's truer than most people would like to believe. You're expected to know the law. If you want to protect a gift from changing it's nature into a marital asset then you're expected to know the laws and cases that apply. If you don't know them and you cross the boundaries the statutes and cases have set then . . . well, it's best to make sure that you engage an experienced Rhode Island Divorce attorney if you want to have your best chance of keeping that gift.

Consider this case scenario and the questions it poses.

Gladys and Kyle have been dating for about two and a half years. They are both in their final year at the same medical school. Kyle graduates with high honors. Gladys is named valedictorian of her class. Both Gladys and Kyle are thrilled as offers begin to come in for residencies. On graduation day Gladys is with her parents when they congratulate her and hand her a savings passbook with $15,000 in it. Gladys is shocked. Her parents explain that it's a graduation gift to help her get started in her new career.

Kyle likewise meets with his parents who give him a key to a small cottage in Maine that they owned and seldom used but knew Kyle was fond of.

A year later Gladys and Kyle get married. Initially things start off a bit rocky as they manage their schedules so they try to come together a bit more by going to counseling. The counselor suggests that they do something together that takes them away from their jobs.

Gladys and Kyle settle on going to the cottage in Maine to spend time together. However, when they get there, they find its not in the best of shape and Gladys suggests they fix it up and she offers to dip into the passbook savings account she received from her parents.

About $5,000 later the cottage looks excellent. They spend the next two weeks at the cottage and for the next year they go to the cottage once a month for the weekend just to "get away together."

Unfortunately, as sometimes is the case careers and marriages don't make good bedfellows. Gladys and Kyle each get offers in the medical profession that they want to take in very distant locations and neither is willing to compromise. Kyle files for divorce. Gladys files a counterclaim for divorce.

Kyle is in shock when Gladys demands that the cottage in Maine be sold.

Gladys is just as much in shock when Kyle claims that he is entitled to half (1/2) of the remaining $10,000 in the passbook savings account her parents gave her at graduation.

Various questions arise here with perhaps a dozen legal arguments that might be made.  Here are just a few.

1. Does either the cottage or the passbook account (as they stand in the divorce right now) survive as a gift so they aren't considered part of the marital estate?

2. If Gladys voluntarily gave the $5,000 from her passbook account to fix up the cottage in Maine, did she give Kyle that money as a gift?

3.  If they both used the cottage while they were husband and wife, does it then become marital property?

4. If Kyle was put on the passbook savings account as the beneficiary in case of Gladys' death, does that have any bearing on Kyle's claim that it is a marital asset and he should get half?

5. If Kyle and Gladys filed joint tax returns each year as Married Filing Jointly and they took the property tax deductions on the cottage as well as claimed the interest income on the passbook savings account, does this affect either of their claims?

If you were faced with questions like this by a Rhode Island Divorce Judge on just this single issue of gifts, how would you respond?

As an attorney focusing my practice in Rhode Island Divorce and Family law I am trained to anticipate these things, yet in this scenario I see at least seven (7) other legal questions and issues that might need to be addressed. See if you can identify them?

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce - Do the Rules Apply?

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

All the courts in Rhode Island have rules upon which they operate and which are supposed to govern their administration and substantive processes.  The Rhode Island Family Court is no exception.  The rules are called the Rhode Island Rules of Domestic Relations Procedure.  It is advisable when you are in a divorce or if you must go before the Rhode Island Family Court that you be very familiar with these rules.

Why then is this divorce article entitled, " Do the rules apply?"

The answer lies as with all things in those who are empowered to carry out and enforce these rules.  So to the extent that a particular rule relates to an administrative provision that should be adhered to then the enforcement would be directed to the person or people responsible for enforcing and administering that rule.

If the particular rule is one of law, is substantive in nature, or is procedural and relates to processes in administering rulings in court, the enforcing parties would generally be considered the judges and/or the court clerks who run the court calendar.

The answer to the question is both fundamental and practical.  Fundamentally the rules apply to the Rhode Island family court because that is their intended purpose, namely they apply because their very provisions say they apply and they have been sanctioned and approved by those with the power to make such rules.

Practically speaking, the Rules only apply part of time.  I say this because on a practical level as a practitioner I am aware that some judges and clerks may from time to time disregard one or more rules.  Some of this results from afterthoughts regarding the practicality of the rule when dealing with the actual movement of the court's calendars.

In other cases, it may be a blatant disregard for the rule or even the canons of judicial ethics because the judge disagrees with the rule or canon or because he or she has his own agenda.  This disregard is what both practitioners and litigants must be aware of because it is this conduct that may create injustices or otherwise lead to a result that conflicts with existing law.  In some instances these, shall I say, divergences from rules, canons, laws or policies are sporadic.  In other instances they may be habitual to the point of being common practice.

Why do I call this to your attention?  Simple.  You should know.  Anyone going into any arena where they must take a position and fend off the attacks of another party should be entitled to know the rules of the forum.

To this end, as a service to my own clients and to others I conclude this divorce article with these words of caution.  There are rules to the court arena you'll enter but don't be surprised if the rules suddenly change in mid-battle.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer - Tips about Your Marital Home

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Retirement accounts in divorce actions usually include any number of types of accounts.  The following are just a few.

Annuities

Pensions

401(K) Plans

403(B) Plans

SEP Plans (Simplified Employee Pension Plans)

IRAs (Individual Retirement Accounts)

Both prior to and during the course of many marriages retirement accounts are formed and appreciate.  When a divorce complaint is filed in family court any and all retirement accounts that were opened during the marriage or appreciated during the marriage come under the scrutiny of the family court as a possible marital asset.

So how do you know whether your retirement account might be a marital asset?

These two examples should be helpful to understand a few basic concepts.

Scenario No. 1

Jack worked at P&H Electrical.  Jack had a 401(K) plan that he invested in.  Jack had $23,000 in his 401(k) when he married Jill.  During their marriage Jack continued to contribute to his 401(K) until Jill filed for divorce in Rhode Island 5 years later.  At the time of the filing of the divorce complaint Jack's 401(k) had reached $57,000.

Jack didn't want to surrender any of his 401(k) to Jill because she didn't contribute to it, however that didn't matter.  During the marriage, marital monies from Jack's income were contributed to the 401(K) and therefore at least part of Jack's 401(k) became marital when he married Jill and then made contributions into that 401(k).

The $23,000 was created by Jack prior to the marriage, therefore it should be exempt from the marital estate as well as any appreciation associated with that $23,000.

However, every dollar contributed by Jack, Jack's employer (if they match funds) and all the appreciation on those monies until the conclusion of the divorce would be considered marital funds subject to division by the family court.

Let's assume the total of the account by the time of the divorce trial is $62,000. After subtracting the $23,000, $39,000 would normally be the marital portion subject to equitable distribution by the court.  This would be divided either by agreement or by the presiding judge after a trial on the merits by a Qualified Domestic Relations Order.

A Qualified Domestic Relations Order is a relatively complex document drawn up by a qualified professional who is proficient with the intricacies of such orders and the various plans that exist.  It is a very technical Order to draft and is usually referred by most domestic relations attorneys to a specialist lawyer who drafts these Orders on a regular basis.

Scenario No. 2

 

Tim and Charlotte are married for 17 years.  Tim has been contributing to a pension provided by his company since their second year of marriage.  Tim files for divorce.  Charlotte files a counterclaim for divorce and wants half of the estimated value of Tim's Pension when it reaches distribution.

At trial it's determined that Tim is 15 years into his pension but that he is not vested until he reaches his 20 year anniversary.  Charlotte's attorney argues that they were married for more than half of Tim's total vesting period and therefore she should get 50% of his pension payment when Tim does vest.  Tim's attorney argues that Charlotte would then be getting the benefit arising out of the last five years of service without being married to him and therefore the request is outside of the power of the court.

The trial judge determined that divorce assets are to be valued as of the time of the entry of the final decree and since Tim would not vest before the final decree of divorce entered that Charlotte could not be entitled to half of the vested payment.  The court ordered that the value of the contributions to the pension be determined and Charlotte was awarded half of the contributions.

The trial judge's ruling found that a vested payment in a pension cannot be divided if it doesn't exist.  If a pension plan has not vested, the pension only consists of the contributions made to the plan and those contributions are the only thing that exist to be divided.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce Attorney - Dealing with Credit Card Debts

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Credit cards are often one of the most consistent types of debts that is dealt with in Rhode Island Divorce case.

Credit cards can pose their own divorce difficulties. Some years back, at the beginning of my divorce practice, I thought that credit cards would create the same issues as any other debts. I quickly learned from a few practical case experiences that credit cards come with their own considerations that may or may not make a difference to your client.

So what makes credit cards different? 

First and foremost, because of the explosion of the internet in the last decade or so credit cards are easy to apply for and if a person has a decent credit rating they are pretty easy to get, not only in your own name, but in a spouse's name as well.

Another aspect of credit cards is the "authorized user." The authorized user is a person who is authorized to use the card to charge things but is not obligated to pay the credit card bill itself. An authorized user is usually placed on the credit card account by the primary cardholder and receives their own card in order to make charges against the account. It is only the primary credit card holding that is held liable for paying the credit card bill.

A third aspect of credit cards that consumers are generally aware of that can play a role in a divorce is their high interest rates. Credit card interest rates can run from 9% to 29% interest or more and can fluctuate with the market or even with the timeliness of your payments depending upon your contract with your credit card company.

One other challenge that may affect the equitable distribution of credit card debt is what I call the "shifting balance." The shifting balance occurs when a primary cardholder, either with or without discussing it with his or her spouse will shift the outstanding balance on one credit card to an entirely different credit card that is usually offering a promotion of say "O% APR for the 1st Six Months for Balance Transfers" or "0% APR for the 1st Three Months for Balance Transfers PLUS a $5,000 Credit Line Increase for Qualified Participants".

Now let's take an example or two to see how one or two of these factors could affect a divorce proceeding.

Christian and Teresa get married in their late 20's. Both of them have good paying jobs and impeccable credit. The housing market is a bit pricey so they decide to wait so they can get a house that really suits them. Things are fine for about a year or so when Teresa gets a promotion which requires her to travel overseas for business negotiations. Teresa gets a credit card offer and without discussing it with Christian she qualifies for a $10,000 credit line. While traveling for business Teresa develops a need for fine clothing if she is to get further ahead in her career.

In a short period of time she charges up $10,000 of designer clothing which she slips into her closet in their apartment a bit at a time.

Meanwhile, the housing market has dropped somewhat and Christian wants to look at houses. Teresa tells Christian that she thinks she'll be up for a promotion soon and it will make it financially easier to make the purchase if they wait. Christian agrees that it's a good idea.

Teresa actually does get a promotion and immediately calls her credit card company to get a credit line increase. Her credit card company increases her limit to $22,500 and on her next tip Teresa uses up all but $200 of her credit line.

Again Teresa brings the clothing home and slips it into her closet unnoticed. The next day Teresa's manager calls to tell her that as a bonus they are sending her to Las Vegas for five days next month.

Teresa is very excited and since Christian is working late she fills out a credit card application using his information and income and requesting a credit card balance transfer of all the monies on her card to this new card. She also indicates that she is to be an authorized user on the card.

A week later the credit card comes in the mail approved for Christian for $45,000 as the limit and it already has Teresa's balance transferred to it so that now her own card has a zero balance.

Teresa goes to to Las Vegas and gambles the night away, using up her credit card limit. She's not satisfied so she pulls out the card she took out in Christian's name and gambles it to its limit. It's not until the plane ride back that Teresa realizes the severity of what she's done.

For several months Teresa is able to intercept her credit card bill as well as Christian's but she is late on two of the payments and the credit card companies penalize Christian's card by increasing the interest rate from 9.19% to 29% on everything charged over the 0% balance transfer. Teresa begins making double and triple payments on the card in Christian's name in order to repair any blemishes to his credit but she is too late.

Christian goes to the bank to get pre-qualified only to discovery that a card has been taken out in his name with a less than perfect payment history and a balance of just under $45,000. He is worried that his identity has been stolen but when he calls the credit card company and they fax a few statements to him he realizes that the charges all coincide with the places Teresa has been going.

Christian gets home and confronts her about the credit card in his name. Teresa denies it adamantly for about 2 hours and then admits what she did. He asks her if there is anything else he should know about and she tells him "No".

Christian is very upset and very hurt that his wife actually stole his identity and damaged his credit when she knew how important it was to him and how necessary it was to get a house. Christian asks Teresa to meet him at the bank tomorrow to see if they can still prequalify for a house. Teresa refuses and says she likes their apartment.

Christian goes to the bank the next day and the bank representative pulls Teresa's credit at his request. Christian sees the credit card and the poor payment history. The banker makes it clear that there is no way Christian and Teresa will pre-qualify for a house based upon the outstanding debt and payment history. The banker suggests that it will take several years to repair the damage that has been done.

The banker recommends that Christian file a fraud report with the credit card company and file a report with the Rhode Island State Police. Christian doesn't want to do that.

Christian is crushed by Teresa's betrayal of trust and he files for divorce.

What issues might arise regarding this credit card debt?

1. Does it matter that Teresa's action in opening an account with Christian's information is a criminal offense?

2. Can Teresa claim that her clothing purchases were for her employment which benefited the marriage and therefore were marital debt?

3. Since Christian refused to fill out a fraud report and a Rhode Island State Police Report has he conceded that the debt belongs to him? Or has he conceded that it's marital debt?

4. If Teresa can legitimately take business tax deductions for the clothing she purchased as well as the gambling losses during her business bonus trip, should that affect the amount of debt that Teresa should be responsible for in the divorce?

5. Is there anything the family court judge can do to repair or minimize the damage done to Christian's finances and his credit?

6.  Can any of this be considered marital debt when Christian had no idea this debt was accumulating?

7. If Christian thinks he shouldn't have to pay anything, what is the most likely amount he could be ordered to pay and where does that amount come from?

There is at least one more issue that affects Christian significantly in this whole scenario. Can you identify it? It could make a huge difference financially to Christian. If you were Christian, wouldn't you want to find it.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce - Questions to Ask about Joint Bank Accounts

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Before getting married Jill and Brandon opened a joint bank account that paid a small amount of interest. Jill contributed $6,000 that she had in a certificate of deposit that had matured. Brandon inherited $12,000 from a relative and put that in the account as well.

Jill and Brandon got married and both of them contributed to the joint bank account each month for the next five (5) years. Jill filed for divorce. Several issues were disputed by Brandon, including Jill's claim that she was entitled to half (1/2) of the entire joint bank account.

If you were to argue this before the court, what would Brandon argue?

What would Jill argue?

What does the law have to say about joint bank accounts?

Does it make a difference that contributions were made before they were married?

Are those contributions treated differently under the law than the ones made during the marriage?

What would happen to the monies if either spouse died during the divorce proceeding?


Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce Tip on Legal Custody

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Beyond any doubt it is the minor children of any divorce that are of most concern to the court and many times to the attorneys involved in the cases.

As I have heard stated by several Rhode Island Family Court judge's, "it is one of our supreme responsibilities to attend to the protection and safety of the children within our borders".

As an attorney I am an officer of the court and believe that even when representing a parent in a divorce, I am duty bound to be cognizant of what is happening to the minor children placed with either parent.

One aspect in which both the court and the attorneys address this concern for the minors within Rhode Island is for the court to determine the appropriateness of legal custody for one or both parents and for the attorneys and clients / parents to carry that through.

Legal Custody is often confused with physical placement because custody often means "having possession of something". Thankfully once you understand that legal custody does NOT mean where the child physically is, then it is much easier to understand.

Legal Custody is the legal right to have a say when making important decisions about the child, including healthcare, education, religious upbringing, activities and overall wellfare.

Typically there are only two forms of Legal Custody. There is "sole legal custody" in which one person has the only say regarding what happens in these areas of a child's life. Then there is "joint legal custody" in which two people share the responsibility equally for making the decisions in these areas of the child's life.

What happens if the two parent's disagree?

You return to Rhode Island family court and a judge will determine what is in the best interests of the minor child and issue Orders accordingly.

During the course of a divorce, it is common that the parents will agree that they will share joint legal custody of the minor child. The reason that it is not uncommon is that joint legal custody is typically thought to be the natural way of things. If either party wants to seek sole custody of a minor child and deprive the other parent of his or her rights as a legal custodian for the child then it is likely that the parent petitioning for sole legal custody either (1) is bitter and simply wants to hurt the other parent in the divorce, or (2) the parent petitioning for sole legal custody does not understand the concept and the fundamental rights it is asking the court to strip from the other parent, or (3) the parent petitioning for sole legal custody is aware of some conduct, habit, pattern, addiction, or other activitity that would render that spouse unsuitable to render important decisions for his or her child.

This is why the question is typically asked of each spouse in a Rhode Island Divorce proceeding "Do you believe that the other spouse is a fit and proper person to share joint legal custody of the child.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

Attorney Pearsall's practice is focused almost exclusively in the areas of Divorce and Family law.

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is based on Rhode Island and is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Family Law Attorney - Visitation Basics

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Visitation is a rather straightforward concept. It is the right of a non-placement parent to spend time with his or her children.

Visitation may be supervised or unsupervised.

The vast majority of visitation is unsupervised.  This generally occurs in one of three ways. 

1) The parent who will be visiting with the child or children picks the child or children up from the placement parent's home at a designated date and/or time and then returns them to the placement parents' home again at a designated date and/or time.

2) The placement parent drops off the child or children at the visiting parent's home at a designated time and later returns and picks the child or children up at a designated date and time.

3) Both parents meet at a neutral, usually public, agreed upon location to exchange the child/children for their visitation and agree to return to that location or another suitable neutral public location to exchange the children for their return to the placement parent's house.

Supervised visitation generally occurs in one of two ways.

1) Supervised visitation is ordered by the court usually at a specified periodic interval (such as weekly or bi-weekly) and is set up through the Family Services Division and monitored by one of it's members.

2) Supervised visitation is ordered by the court at a periodic interval and sometimes a specific location. The supervision is usually performed by a family member or a third party who has agreed to monitor the visitation and report to the court.

A partially misunderstood concept is that "placement" and "visitation" are contradictory concepts. However, in actuality that is not the case. If this section seems at all confusing, re-read the section of this website on "Placement". This may help you with a better understanding of the presentation of the idea that "placement" and "visitation" are only different in time spans.

Consider this example from a Final Judgement of Divorce.

"7.  Plaintiff, Mother is awarded placement of the minor child Nathan (DOB 12/1/95)."

"8. Defendant, Father shall have visitation with the minor child on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays from 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. and every other weekend from Friday at 3 p.m. to Sunday at 7 p.m."

For many purposes placement and visitation are the same.

Placement is the right of the placement parent to physically have possession of the minor child the majority of the time. 

Visitation is the right of the non-placement parent to physically have possession of the minor child on the specified dates and times as set forth in the court's orders or judgments.

As you can see the concept is very similar. Both concepts involve the right of a parent to have physical possession of the minor child on specified dates and times.

However, it would be incorrect to make the mistake that Placement and Visitation are identical for ALL purposes. There are three typical differences between Placement and Visitation.

1)  Placement involves the right of the placement parent to maintain what is viewed by the court as the child's "home".

2)  Placement carries with it the common view that that placement parent is the "primary caregiver" for the minor child.

3) Since the Placement parent is viewed as the primary caregiver and presumably provides the majority of the child's care and needs, the placement parent is typically awarded child support from the non-placement parent.


Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Family Law Attorneys Tip - Understanding Placement

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

"Placement" or "Physical Placement" is often confused by laypeople with "Legal Custody" in divorce matters and post divorce relief.

Without repeating the last section let's get into what "Placement" or "Physical Placement" is in a Rhode Island Divorce proceeding. Thankfully, it is exactly what it sounds like. It is the physical place where the child primarily resides.

In the same way that there are two forms of legal custody, there are also two forms of "Placement".

The first form is just called "Placement". So if you have a divorce proceeding here in Rhode Island and it is determined by the judge that the best interests of the minor child of the parties of the child are served by the child residing full-time with his mother then the court's ruling would most likely reflect, "The minor child shall be placed with the mother." or something to that effect.

The second form can vary depending upon the attorney, but it is most commonly known as either "joint physical placement" or "shared physical placement". In theory, the spouses each provide what would amount to a primary place for the minor child to live. In otherwords, they would each have a bedroom for the child, toys, television, things to do, etc... and each would provide a stable environment for the minor child. The idea behind "shared physical placement" is that each parent gets equal time with the minor child and also bears equal responsibility for the child.

This type of arrangement may involve one week with one parent and then one week with another, or it may involve three days with one parent and four with another and then they alternate weeks to make up for the one extra day the four day parent got.

Though shared physical placement arrangements are not common and are scrutinized and sometimes discouraged by some Rhode Island Divorce Judges due to the shuffling of the child back and forth and the possibility for conflict between parents who have clearly decided to get divorced for their own reasons, there are positive aspects to this placement arrangement.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Child Support - A Different Perspective

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Rhode Island Child Support is calculated based upon the Rhode Child Support Guidelines which were authorized on September 14, 2007 and went into effect on November 1, 2007.

For those who aren't that familiar with the calculation of the child support itself in the Rhode Island Courts, it is based substantially on the combined gross income of the parents of the child(ren) who are to be supported. There are a few allowable mandatory deductions to a parent's gross income and there are optional deductions allowable by the judge presiding over that particular child support matter in his or her discretion.

The total gross income of the parties is then tallied and the total support for that amount of gross income is then looked up in the Rhode Island Child Support Guideline Tables for the number of children to be supported. The chart then gives you the total amount of child support the child (or children) is entitled to each month.

Each parent's percentage contribution to the total income is then calculated. Ultimately the non-placement parent is typically ordered to pay his or her percentage contribution of the total income when applied to the amount of support the child(ren) are entitled to.

For example, assume total income for one child of the mother and father is $80,000 and that the placement of the child is with the mother who makes $28,000 gross income per year, we know that the non-placement father makes $52,000 gross income per year.

By dividing $52,000 by $80,000 we get 0.65 which demonstrates that the non-placement father makes 65% of the total gross income of the parents/parties. The non-placement father can typically expect to pay 65% of the child support amount that the child is entitled to as shown on the Rhode Child Support Guideline Worksheet.

With this basic understanding that Rhode Island Child Support is based upon gross income, it bears consideration whether the Rhode Island Child Support Guidelines and those who propounded them took into consideration the self-employed individual or those who are employed by another but also have a business of their own in which they are self-employed.

This is much more significant than people realize because those who are "employees" and receive a W-2 each year have certain deductions from their paycheck that are for the most part "standard" (with some exceptions of course) and those who promulgated the Rhode Island Child Support Guidelines could reasonable anticipate and plan for those deductions. However, each self-employed business owner in order to achieve his or her income (gross or net) relies on the rules of Federal Taxation and it's various deductions to account for products, losses, theft, overhead, independent contractors, etc.... none of which may necessarily be attributable to "Gross Income" and all of which may be wholly disproportionate to an employee's mandatory deductions.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Exerpt of an Interview with a Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

All Rhode Island Divorce Attorneys and Family Law Lawyers are NOT created equal!

Why?  Let me explain.

The yellow pages and the internet are littered with advertisements for lawyers offering divorce services.

But the Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses ALL attorneys in the general practice of law. 

The Rhode Island Supreme Court doesn't license attorneys in specific areas of practice.

Yet don't you want a lawyer that knows the ins and outs of Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law?

So how do you find an attorney who really knows what they are doing in Rhode Island Divorce and Family law?

Well, it's not as easy as you might think because the attorney has done one of two things when he or she advertises. The attorney has either (1) simply included "Divorce and Family Law" as a category he or she will take cases in because the more categories you include the more likely you are to get calls from prospective clients, OR (2) the Rhode Island Attorney has included "Divorce and Family Law" because he or she has truly taken the time and effort to focus his or her practice in that specific area of law.

It's the second class of attorneys that you truly want to locate and interview for your Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law Attorney.

This introduction is certainly not intended to discourage you. It is intended to inform you so that you can make the best choice that suits your needs.

Its can be a tough search because any lawyers who offers a legal service may or may not be skilled in it! That is something you need to find out in the interview process.

For instance, I am not certified as a Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law Lawyer by the Rhode Island Supreme court. Why is that? Because no attorney is! We are all licensed as general practitioners here in Rhode Island.

So how can someone legitimately offer services as a Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law Lawyer to the public if they've got nothing else to show for it except their license to practice law generally in Rhode Island? The answer is . . . they just can! Plain and simple! Divorce is an area of law and they have a license to practice in any area of law so nothing prevents them from advertising that they do so.

So, in otherwords, if someone advertises they are a Divorce Lawyer, Personal Injury Lawyer, Estates Lawyer, etc.... then it's something they've self-proclaimed. It's an area of law they've decided to practice in . . so they put it in their advertisement.

Now for the million dollar question.  What makes me any different, right?  Well, the answer itself is odder than most.

Like most other attorneys who I consider true Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law Attorneys, I have chosen specifically to practice in this area of law. I've kept up with the law and it's rulings and I practice in the Rhode Island Family Court System on a weekly....if not daily basis.

This is what makes a "Divorce" attorney truly different from any "Divorce" advertisement that may be out there. A true Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law Attorney will practice regularly before the Rhode Island Family Courts and will make it their business to keep up to date on family law rulings, court orders, etc...

One thing my clients find interesting about me is that "I tell it like it is." I don't sugar coat anything and I don't try to drag their matter out. I want it resolved as favorable to my client as possible and as fast as possible.

I met with a prospective client at the end of 2007 and told him that. He thought I was handing him a "line" just to get his business. Here's the response that followed:

Potential Client:   Yeah, sure.

Attorney Pearsall:  You don't believe me do you?

Potential Client:  It's just that no lawyer really does that.  They spin it out to make more money.

Attorney Pearsall: Well, I'm sorry you feel that way and it may be true of other lawyers but it's not true of me. If you knew me you'd understand.

Potential Client:  Well what is so different about you that I should believe you.

Attorney Pearsall:  If it makes a difference. . . I hate family law and dislike lawyers even more.

Potential Client:  That doesn't make any sense.  Why do you practice family law then?

Attorney Pearsall: To make a long story short, I attended the seminary to become a priest in my early years but left when I realized I wanted a family. So I got married, went through a terrible divorce, was held in contempt, went bankrupt, got laid off from my job of 10 years, sacrificed my house and just about everything I owned for the sake of my children and later became a lawyer. The divorce experience affected me so profoundly that I swore I'd never practice divorce or family law.

Potential Client:  Okay.  So why are you practicing in it?

Attorney Pearsall: I searched for a job for months. The only thing I could find was a position as an independent contractor paying very little money. So I picked up a few of my own clients here and there and I worked on a project basis as an independent contractor. Just about every project was a divorce or family law issue. I fell into it by necessity and I had to put food on the table.

Potential Client:  So why are you still practicing in it if you hate it?

Attorney Pearsall: Well, after you do things over and over again you get good at them. I disliked it but here I am with my colleagues telling me that I'm really good at it. I started to become known for it.

Potential Client:  So it's because you were stuck with it.

Attorney Pearsall: No, it was because I got good at it. I'd already been through my own divorce and I could truly understand client's concerns and emotions. I began caring about what my clients were going through and I began working harder for my clients because of it.

Potential Client:  So do you consider yourself a Rhode Island Divorce attorney?

Attorney Pearsall: Absolutely. I keep up with the law in the area but I keep focused on my client's legal and non-legal needs. I think this desire to help people and do the right thing came from my seminary days, and for that I am extremely thankful.

Potential Client:  So what makes you so different?

Attorney Pearsall: If you need a Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law Lawyer, that's the majority of my law practice. I'm not a newbie right out of law school without any practical skills. I know what I'm doing. And...I care about my clients because I've walked in their shoes. I'm here to help people through the process and let them know they have me on their side to shield them from the anxiety and stress. In my opinion there's a big difference between an attorney who practices family law and one who has actually lived it. I've lived it and practiced it. If you haven't lived it you just can't appreciate the client's situation enough to care about the client. Sometimes that caring is what gives me the edge to win a case for the client.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce - Dating and When to Start

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Though I am a Rhode Island Divorce Attorney, you don't have to have any experience in law whatsoever to know your own heart.  Now, let me preface this article by saying that I am not advocating dating before your divorce is finalized.  In fact, depending upon which judge you go before in the Rhode Island Family Court System, their philosophies on adultery vary and it could very well affect the outcome of your divorce in more ways than one.

Consider the case below:

Brad and Linda are getting divorced.  Brad files for divorce and Linda files a counter-claim for divorce both in March of 2008.  They have two children, both girls, namely Gretta who is 12 and Lisa who is 10.  Due to the constant arguing Brad moves out of the house and goes to stay with family members.  Immediately Brad is seen by his daughters as the "bad guy" because he filed for divorce and because he left the house.  Linda is very angry about the divorce and hires an attorney who causes the divorce to drag on for months.  It is now July 2008 and the divorce has been pending for about five months.   Brad meets up with a young lady while bowling with a friend one evening and they become friends.   The relationship quickly escalates into a dating relationship and as the divorce continues to drag on Brad ends up sleeping with his new girlfriend and then moves in with her.

Linda’s attorney files a Motion to Amend her counterclaim for divorce to a divorce based on adultery.  Brad's attorney objects, however the motion is granted.

In this particular case, family law attorneys differ in the advice they would give. 

Some attorneys would counsel Brad not to date anyone or get involved with a new relationship until the divorce is complete.  Other attorneys would advise Brad that any relationship he has with any other woman, regardless if intercourse is involved, should be discreet.  Finally, other attorneys would advise that a casual relationship with a female is acceptable as long as it is discreet and Brad does not have intercourse with another woman until after the Final Judgment of Divorce has entered.

These varying pieces of advice arise because an opposing party could use the information to make Brad look like a cheater and not worth trusting.  This of course could affect the credibility of Brad's testimony before the court.  The argument could also be made that this new woman in Brad's life was the cause of the breakdown of the marriage and therefore Brad should get a lesser apportionment of the marital assets or a greater assignment of the marital debts.

As individuals, we often follow our heart and not simply the practical advice of our attorneys.  The heart does not know the of the law and frankly doesn't care. 

Divorce is generally the division of a relationship that doesn't work and involves two unhappy hearts.  It is human nature that we all strive for happiness and avoid unhappiness.  Many times the very fact that we have machinations such as the divorce process is a testament to the fact that legal mechanisms exist to allow us to continue with our lives separate and apart from the other person we married. 

As individuals, our journey to find happiness may not necessarily follow the same timeline as the court's divorce schedule.  With divorce hearings that may be prolonged and cause a person to be married to another person much longer than they wish to be married to that person, is it any wonder that there is a varying moral standard among many individuals about what is "cheating" on your spouse and even "when" it is considered "cheating" on your spouse.

If Brad separates from his wife for 6 months while they try to save their marriage and he comes to the conclusion the marriage is not going to work, and then he sleeps with another woman the following month, has he cheated on his wife?

If Brad files for divorce and not intending to he falls in love 3 months later and sleeps with the woman, has he cheated on his wife?

Is cheating a matter of law or a matter of the heart?

If Brad’s heart no longer has love for his wife but he finds another person he cares for, can he be considered cheating at all?

If cheating is based upon his wife Linda’s continued love for him and they get divorced and Brad finds someone else as Linda continues to pine for him, is Brad cheating?

These are but questions to ponder for those faced with these situations.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Child Support: What is Earning Capacity?

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

In a Rhode Island family law proceeding, usually involving the establishment or modification of child support, you may hear the judge or an attorney state that perhaps one or the other of two parents need to have an earning capacity set.  Yet what is an "earning capacity" and what affect might it have on the child support at issue?

Earning capacity is generally raised when one or the other of two parents is alleged to "not be pulling their weight" so to speak when it comes to the amount of money they could or should be earning in order to support the minor child(ren). 

Typically the issue is addressed when one parent files a Motion to Set Earning Capacity for the other parent.  You see this motion more frequently where a father is making considerable money and he gets laid off from his company or gets taken out of work for reasons of TDI (Temporary Disability) and is not bringing in nearly as much as when he was working full-time.  You will also see it when the payer of the child support, usually the father, has a change of position or change of career and that change comes with a reduced income.

A Motion to Set an Earning Capacity is typically an evidentiary hearing which allows both parties to question witnesses under other and to enter into evidence any relevant and admissible documentation that has a bearing on the issue of the respondent's ability to earn income.

Regrettably this motion is somewhat insidious in character.  The objective of the moving party may be one of two tacts.  Usually the moving party wants to show that the respondent has previously made more money than he or she is currently making and therefore his or her earning capacity is the higher amount of money he or she previously made.  If the court were to buy this argument then the respondent may only be bringing in $488 per week in actual income but the court may find that the respondent's earning capacity is the $975 per week the respondent used to make through former employment.

As you can imagine this has a dramatic affect not only on the amount of child support that the court may order the respondent to pay but it also may render the respondent unable to survive if he complies with the child support order.  The respondent is then placed in an untenable position where he or she will end up in contempt of court simply because he or she paid minimal expenses to survive.

The purpose behind the Motion to Set an Earning Capacity seems to be to stop the malingering of men and women who work the system and do not properly support their children by avoiding work and essentially becoming deadbeats who prey on public programs not because they have to but because they choose to as a way of life.

Unfortunately, all too often the Motion to Set an Earning Capacity is used by many Rhode Island Family Law Attorneys as a method of squeezing more money out of good people who have, in fact, supported their children, but may have come upon rough times.  Attorneys know full well that without substantial documentation or witnesses presented on behalf of the respondent, that the decision of the court may come down to an issue of credibility between the movant and the respondent.  This becomes a sad state of affairs if the respondent answers truthfully and correctly and provides ample information by testimony to demonstrate that an earning capacity should not be set above what he or she is making but the judge believes either from appearances or demeanor the testimony of the movant which may well consist of lies.

You can consider "Earning Capacity" to be your ability to earn income at the current time, based upon your previous employment, trade skills and education in the current marketplace under current economic conditions.

If any of the foregoing article was confusing and you are faced with this motion, do not take it lightly.  You should contact a family law attorney and get legal advice to know the proper means of your defense for your situation.

In a nut shell, the establishment of an Earning Capacity for you means that you will be paying child support or perhaps temporary spousal support based upon an amount of money that you do not make and perhaps have no chance of making but which the court orders that you have the "ability" to make.


Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce Attorney - What is an Uncontested Divorce?

| 1 Comment | 0 TrackBacks

When searching for a divorce attorney I find that many of the calls I receive have the caller telling me something like this,

I have an uncontested divorce.  My wife and I have agreed on everything so there should be very little you have to do.  How much do you charge for that?

Regrettably it isn't that easy.  Usually the caller is trying to simply shop for the lowest price possible using the telephone rather than making an appointment.  All in all it's far from the best way to shop for a divorce lawyer regardless of whether you think you have an agreement or not.

The problem?  Most people misunderstand what an uncontested divorce is. 

Let me clarify for those who may not have a clear understanding of what it is.  When you file for divorce the court gives you a Nominal Date that is about 6 to 8 weeks away from your filing date.  This is your hearing date for an uncontested hearing.

Now, if you call an attorney and tell him or her that you have an uncontested matter and that everything is agreed upon then here is what you are telling the attorney,

1.  You and your spouse have agreed upon absolutely everything in your divorce.

2.  You don't need legal advice from the attorney regarding your agreement with your spouse because your agreement is what makes it uncontested and if you receive legal advice and change your mind about one or more subjects in your agreement, then your case is no longer contested.

3.  You have, in most cases, reduced your agreement to writing, had it formally executed and used the correct legal terminology so that the court will accept the agreement and you have accomplished as spouses what you planned to agree upon.

4.  Your agreement with your spouse contains everything that the law requires or your divorce attorney is willing to fill in the gaps on the record of the court.

5.  You are able to complete all of this in a timely fashion so you can have the hearing by the Nominal Date.

Now, this is what is known as an uncontested divorce because both parties are in agreement and ready to proceed by the Nominal Date.  That does not mean that a matter cannot become "Nominal" at a later date.

For instance, what if it takes you 12 weeks to reach an agreement and you need the help of an attorney to formulate your agreement.  Your divorce can still become nominal (i.e. agreed upon) and proceed before a judge.  However, it was not uncontested in the true sense of the word because there were issues that needed to be resolved, in other words, one of the spouses was not in agreement either with the terms of the settlement or the wording of it.  Thus, it because a nominal hearing by agreement after being contested for one reason or another.

In my experience, at least 8 out of 10 callers will say they have an uncontested divorce and want me to put a price on it.  In truth about 1 out of 20 callers has the makings of a truly uncontested divorce and the attorney still can't be certain of this until he meets with the client.  Even after meeting with the client the attorney has only heard one side of the story, since the client cannot represent two opposing parties in a divorce.  Therefore, the Rhode Island Divorce lawyer can't be certain if the other party considers the matter uncontested until the proceeding commences.

Ultimately reliance on any quote you are given for an uncontested divorce over the telephone is most likely misplaced.  Attorneys usually bill for the amount of time they spend on a case.  Since an attorney cannot predict what is going to happen in your case, how many faxes you may send, how many times you may call, etc. . . then how is the attorney to know how much your divorce will cost.  In an effort to get a quick telephone quote from an attorney you could inadvertently fail to provide details that would affect the amount of time it takes or the expense.

Rule of Thumb?  Understand what an uncontested divorce truly is.  Realize that a good Rhode Island divorce attorney will not generally give you a quote over the telephone.  Set up a consultation with several divorce attorneys to find the one best suited to you.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Visitation Lawyer: Motions to Enforce Visitation

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Do you have visitation enforcement issues that you need to bring before the Rhode Island Family Court? 

You may have more difficulty than you anticipate.  Although it is great to be optimistic and to think that all parents will be given the benefit of the doubt when it comes to visitation with their children.  That is not necessarily so.

What most people do when they haven't hired a family law attorney to assist them is to file a poorly worded motion, show up alone to court, and then just try to blurt out to the court how the other parent is denying you visitation.

Here's the difficulty that arises.  Not everyone tells the court the truth.  Yes, surprising isn't it?!  In fact, there are a good number of people who could care less about the truth if it isn't going to serve there purposes or if it is going to get them in trouble with the court.  It is regrettable but a good many people lie on the witness stand and take their chances that their lie isn't discovered.

So what might the result be?  The parent who has denied you visitation might lie to the judge on the witness stand, might deny that you were prevented from having visitation, might even fabricate a story that you have been rejecting visitation or doing drugs around the child.  Don't believe me?  You are more than welcome to pull some transcripts of cases from the stenographers and I'll be happy to provide the case names.

So what must you do to protect yourself when enforcing your visitation rights?

1.  Stick to the Point - Don't let the other parent push your buttons or steer you into issues other than the one you came before the court to address.

2.  Dress Respectfully - Dress respectfully for the court.  Avoid jeans, shorts, t-shirts, etc...  It is best to wear at least casual dressware.  Men should wear a tie if possible and remove any earrings, nose rings, tongue rings, etc.  Remember, you want the court to believe you when you speak.

3.  Speak Normally - Speak at a normal tone, volume and pace when addressing the court.  If accusations are made, do not raise your voice.  Remain calm and stick to the issue.

4.  Evidence - Have video, audio, documentary or witness evidence to back up your claims that you were denied visitation with your child(ren).  Do not trust to luck that the judge will find you more believable than the child's mother.  With today's technology it is easy to have a friend or family member go with you and take a video camera to tape the denial of the release of the child for visitation.  The camcorder could note the date and time and the address could be noted by taping the mailbox. 

Another way to get evidence is to bring an audio recorder with you and tape the conversation between you and the other parent when the visitation is denied.  Telephone call records can be helpful if they track local calls.  They could show the time and date of calls you made to the other parent asking for visitation with the child.

The more evidence you have that can be verified that is consistent with the testimony you give the court, the more likely you are to obtain the relief you are seeking from the court.  For the parent who is very serious about his or her visitation with their child, you will be creative and innovative in the information you can obtain.

If you are able to have a witness present on one or more occasions when you were supposed to receive visitation and the witness can be present to testify then ask your witness to dress appropriately, etc...  just as you have learned in this article and your credibility score with the court will double.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.

Rhode Island Divorce Attorneys - What are you paying for?

| 1 Comment | 0 TrackBacks

When hiring a Rhode Island Divorce Attorney, or even when shopping around for one, you want to know what you are paying for.  The best way to do this is to compare the "Fee Agreement", "Retainer Agreement" and/or "Engagement Letter" provided by each attorney.

Things you want to be sure of.

1.  If you wanted to hire a specific attorney make sure the attorney cannot delegate his duties to another attorney.

2.  Be aware of the billing increment.  Some attorneys bill in 10 minute increments, others in 15 minute increments, a good standard to look for is 6 minute increments.  This means that if your agree to a 6 minute billing increment then the smallest increment of time you may be billed for is 6 minutes.

3.  What costs have you agreed to pay for in your agreement with the attorney?  Have you agreed to pay postage costs, mileage, research fees, parking, long distance telephone costs, constable fees.

Authored by:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
PEARSALL LAW ASSOCIATES
571 Pontiac Avenue
Cranston, RI  02910
Phone:  (401) 354-2369

NOTE:  The postings on this website are NOT legal advice, DO NOT create an attorney/client relationship and are NOT a substitute for a detailed consultation with an attorney experienced in the state where you have your legal issue.  This site is presented for the convenience of the internet public.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialty in any area of law.